30 What shall we say then? That Gentiles, who did not pursue righteousness, attained righteousness, even the righteousness which is by faith;
31 but Israel, pursuing a Law of righteousness, did not arrive at that Law.
32 Why? Because they did not pursue it by faith, but as though it were by works. They stumbled over the stumbling stone,
33 just as it is written, “Behold, I lay in Zion a stone of stumbling and a rock of offense, and he who believes in Him will not be disappointed.”
Romans 9:30-33
Justification: A Declaration of Righteousness
The idea of justification is all over Romans. Paul makes much of the true nature and means of justification as support for his statements about Jews, Gentiles, and salvation. So before actually dealing with the passage tonight, we need to spend some time clearly and precisely defining justification. We need to ask the question, “What did Paul really mean when he wrote the word, ‘justify?’ Not “What do systematic theologians say about it. But “What did Paul think about it.” If we cannot correctly define justification, we cannot correctly comprehend this passage or the apostle Paul.
Maybe the best place to go in our mission to think like Paul is the Old Testament. Because it was the Bible of the early Church and also the Jewish Holy Book, it probably molded Paul’s thinking more than anything else. We would do well then to let it mold our thinking about justification as well. Here are three particularly eye-opening texts from the Pentateuch.
“Keep far from a false charge, and do not kill the innocent or the righteous, for I will not acquit the guilty [LXX renders this, ‘justify the ungodly'].” Exodus 23:7
“So Judah said, ‘What can we say to my Lord? What can we speak? And how can we justify ourselves?’” Gen 44:16
“If there is a dispute between men and they go to court, and the judges decide there case, and they justify the righteous and condemn the wicked . . .” Deuteronomy 25:1
Considering these OT uses, my definition of justification is this: a declaration or recognition that some one who is righteous is righteous.
Take into account this example. A man brings into court a charge of ox stealing against another man. The evidence is brought before the judge and it is obvious that the defendant has not stolen the ox as has been accused. Concerning this situation, the defendant is righteous. The judge then publicly proclaims and recognizes the righteousness of the man.
That is justification. The judge looks at the defendant, who has not stolen an ox, and says, “You have not stolen an ox.” It is a proclamation that the man who is righteous is righteous. He is justified. He is vindicated.
I believe that justification is exactly the same in Paul’s mind. All men are brought before God the Judge, both now and in the future. God looks at those who are wicked and condemns them and looks at those who are righteous and says, “You are righteous”–He accepts them and recognizes them as what they are. That is justification.
This is a slight shift in understanding for me. Whereas before, I saw justification as a more creative term (describing how we are made righteous), I now see it as a more declarative term (describing how we are proclaimed to be righteous). There is no change in the substance of what I believe (we are unrighteous by nature and must be forensically made righteous in Christ to ever be declared righteous or “justified”). I am only defining more precisely the terms we use.
We are now in a position to comprehend Romans 9:30-33.
Where and How Do You Get Righteousness?
Even though it does not use the word, this passage is all about justification. And ultimately it is a back up and summary of what Paul has said about Jews and Gentiles–that somehow many Gentiles (who were previously excluded from the covenants of promise) are being justified and many Jews (who are the people of God and seem as though they should be) are not.
The question that Paul answers to back up and sum up what he says about Jews and Gentiles is this: Where and how do you get righteousness? We have already established that you must have righteousness to have justification. No just judge ever justifies an unrighteous person. So the pressing and revealing question is: where does true righteousness come from?
There are two answers to this question. We will start with the one Paul mentions second.
The Jewish Answer
“Israel, pursuing a Law of righteousness, did not arrive at that Law. Why? Because they did not pursue it by faith, but as though it were by works.” (31-32)
Israel recognized the need for justification and God’s Old Covenant promises that pointed toward it. But they had two foundational problems.
First, the Jews thought that justification would be something only for Jews and would happen in a national way. It would be a temporal deliverance and vindication before the world. The reason for this kind of thinking is found the Old Testament. Over and over again, God would deliver His people, the ethnic Jews, call the nations to gather around in a sort of law-court scene, and point to His people and say, “They are righteous.” The Jews of the 1st Century thought that their full and final deliverance and justification would be the same. That was their first problem. Paul grasped that the final justification and deliverance promised the people of God is not so much outward (justification before the word and deliverance from Roman oppression), but inward–justification before God Himself and deliverance from sin and its consequences.
The second, deeper problem was that the Jews thought the righteousness that would be the ground of their justification would come through meticulous pursuit of the Law. They knew they must have righteousness to be justified, and so they set about to attain that righteousness by circumcision and Sabbath keeping and every other work of the Law. One day, they thought, God would look at them and justify them because of their righteousness.
But Paul said that what Israel pursued it did not obtain. Why? Because they pursued it “as though it were by works.” True righteousness could never be attained by Law keeping because no human could ever keep the Law. And so, they pursued an impossible righteousness through the Law and stumbled over the object that the Law was leading to (Christ and faith).
The Gentile Answer
“What shall we say then? That Gentiles, who did not pursue righteousness, attained righteousness, even the righteousness which is by faith . . .” (9:30)
Even though they did not pursue it or expect it, many Gentiles obtained the justification and deliverance that the Jews could not because God revealed to them the true answer the question, “Where and how do you get righteousness.”
Paul says that they attained the “righteousness which is by faith.” What is this righteousness? Look carefully at Romans 4:5-8. It explains where and how we can have a righteousness that will bring justification.
“But to the one who does not work, but believes in Him who justifies the ungodly, his faith is credited as righteousness, just as David also speaks of the blessing on the man to whom God credits righteousness apart from works . . .”
So somehow God credits righteousness through faith. Now notice what this righteousness is in Paul’s quotation of David.
“Blessed are those whose lawless deeds have been forgiven, and whose sins have been covered. Blessed is the man whose sin the Lord will not take into account.”
The righteousness that God’s credits to us through faith has to do with forgiveness of sins. And of course, forgiveness of sins comes through Jesus’ crucifixion. This is the “righteousness which is by faith” that the Gentiles found and it is the only righteousness that brings about justification.
Conclusion
As I mentioned earlier, Paul is saying all of this to sum up and back up what he has said all through Romans about the all nations nature of salvation–many Gentiles are receiving justification and deliverance and many Jews are not. The reason is that the Gentiles have been shown the righteousness that will justify. It is the righteousness that comes through Jesus’ death and is taken hold of by faith.
This has been more didactic than normal tonight. And we have not had time make any applications. But it very important to clearly grip these issues and to me it is very exciting.
Bryan Elliff © 2008 www.bryanelliff.wordpress.com